The domain name автор.ею = author.eu is for sale, visit https://автор.ею/

THE COPYRIGHT  OF A FOOL  OR  JUGHEAD

This page is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License

Dear Sir or Madam,

You know the Amazon river? "The Amazon River in South America is the largest river by discharge volume of water in the world", Wikipedia.org.

Let's suppose the copyright flows down the creek and river like fish; thousands copyrights flow down the river from thousand creeks and the discharge volume of copyrights is the biggest in the world. Thousands of people (second-party) push them down the river to the first party. If you are the first party, you can get a billionaire. However, you as a third-party (virtual copyright holder) cannot cash your copyright because the copyright has nothing to do with the point of sale (POS). The copyright must be proved in the court of justice, i.e., requires time and money. So, it is not a right; it is suffering.

Facts of reality, pure citations:

1.   Amazon.com's final verdict:

From: counter-notice <counter-notice@amazon.com>
To:    Georgi Politov <georgipolitov@gmail.com>
Date:    7.07.2020 г., 20:32
Ref.: Counter Notice for Complaint ID 7145200541

Hello,

Thank you for your message. While we appreciate your concerns, Amazon.com is required to comply with the terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Under the DMCA, no proof of copyright is required. The counter-noticing party makes a statement under penalty of perjury that they believe the original notice was sent in error and that the content that was removed is not infringing. Once a counter-notice is received, the original claimant has 10 business days to file a lawsuit against the counter-noticing party or we may reinstate the content at issue per the DMCA. For best practices regarding DMCA notices and counter-notices, please review this document available from the USPTO:

https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/DMCA_Good_Bad_and_Situational_Practices_Document-FINAL.pdf

Note that further messages objecting to this process may not receive a response. Thank you for understanding our position on this matter.

Regards,

Amazon.com"

2.    Counter-notice

From: counter-notice <counter-notice@amazon.com>
Date:    2.07.2020 г., 19:41
FW: Counter Notice for Complaint ID 7145200541

"Hello,
We have received the below counter-notice to your report of posting, hosting and/or distributing unlicensed copyright protected material on our network. We will allow this material to be accessible, unless you provide us with notice that a lawsuit has been filed within 10 business days. Please ensure a copy is sent to counter-notice@amazon.com to help ensure efficient processing.
Regards,
Amazon.com

------------------------------------------------------------------
Date From: Wed Jul 01 19:39:41 UTC 2020
Subject: Counter Notification: ASIN: B07M6M3K1B Title: United Nations
peacekeeping: reliance on centralized or regional System Infringement type:
Copyright Complaint ID: 7145200541
ASIN: B07M6M3K1B Title: United Nations peacekeeping: reliance on centralized or regional System Infringement type: Copyright Complaint ID: 7145200541
From Seller: JEMILES

DMCA counter notification letter for the removed content of "ASIN: B07M6M3K1B Title: United Nations peacekeeping: reliance on centralized or regional System Infringement type: Copyright Complaint ID: 7145200541

Dear Amazan:

This is a book in the public domain.
This letter is a formal response to a claim of copyright infringement against one the above titled book that I've had for sale at Amazon.com

I believe the claims of copyright infringement are inaccurate and should be rejected because:
The material in question is not copyrighted, or the copyright has expired in the United States of America. It is therefore in the public domain and may be reproduced by anyone.
The complainant has provided no copyright registration information or other tangible evidence that the material in question is in fact copyrighted, and I have a good faith belief that it is not. The allegation of copyright violation is therefore in dispute, and at present unsupported.
As this is in the public domain, the complainant does not hold the copyright to the material in question, is not the designated representative of the copyright holder, and therefore lacks standing to assert that my use of the material is a violation of any of the owner's rights.
The complaint does not follow the prescribed form for notification of an alleged copyright violation as set forth in the Digital Millennium Copyright  Act, 17 USC 512(c)(3). Specifically, the complainant has failed to:

Provide a complaint in written form. [17 USC 512(c)(3)(A)]
Include a physical or electronic signature of the complainant. [17 USC 512(c)(3)(A)(i)]
Identify the specific copyrighted work claimed to be infringed, or, if multiple copyrighted works are covered by a single complaint, provide a representative list of such works. [17 USC 512(c)(3)(A)(ii)]

Provide the URLs for the specific files on my web site that are alleged to be infringing. [17 USC 512(c)(3)(A)(iii)]
Provide sufficient information to identify the complainant, including full name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address. [17 USC 512(c)(3)(A)(iv)]

Include a written statement that the complainant has a good faith belief that use of the disputed material is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law. [17 USC 512(c)(3)(A)(v)]
Include a written statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complainant is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. [17 USC 512(c)(3)(A)(vi)]
This communication to you is a DMCA counter notification letter as defined in 17 USC 512(g)(3):
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that I have a good faith belief that the complaint of copyright violation is based on mistaken information, misidentification of the material in question, or deliberate misreading of the law.
I ask that Amazon.com, upon receipt of this counter-notification, restore the material in dispute, unless the complainant files suit against me within
ten (10) days, pursuant to 17 USC 512(g)(2)(B).
My name, address, and telephone number are:
JAMES E MILES DBA JEMILES
......
I hereby consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which I reside.
I agree to accept service of process from the complainant.
Best regards,
James E. Miles"

3. My objection

"Dear Sir and/or Madam,

The above counter-notice of Mr Miles addressed to “Amazan” is not valid. Also, that is possible because my information and facts were not communicated to him.

Let me repeat the facts following the statutory requirements of the Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) for formally reporting copyright infringement:

A physical signature (full name) of the copyright owner – Georgi Dimitrov Politov.

Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed - Title: United Nations peacekeeping: reliance on centralized or regional System, author Georgi D Politov, 2003, ISBN 978-619-188-422-3.

Identification of the infringing material and information reasonably sufficient to locate the material on Amazon - ASIN: B07M6M3K1B Title: United Nations peacekeeping: reliance on centralized or regional System, author Georgi D Politov, 2003, Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), published on Amazon.com/ new link and Amazon.fr (ID de la plainte : 6156590462).

My contact information, email address -georgipolitov@gmail.com

A statement that I have a good faith belief that the use of the material in the manner asserted is not authorized by the copyright owner, my agent, or the law:

I do not know Mr Miles nor the other sellers on Amazon and did not authorize him/them to use my material. Mr Miles sent me an email that he is free to download my MBA Report from the Dudley Knox Library, NPS, edit, print and sell it. He repeatedly states: “This is a book in the public domain. The material in question is not copyrighted, or the copyright has expired in the United States of America. It is therefore in the public domain and may be reproduced by anyone. As this is in the public domain, the complainant does not hold the copyright to the material in question”.

Indisputably, I am the author of the material in question. My name is everywhere including on my   MBA diplomaAmazon's web shops, NPS website, etc.

Initially, due to the NPS policy, there was not Copyright Note on it but now it is available. That notice is optional for works created after March 1, 1989, source: Circular 3 of the US Copyright Office. It is registered by The International ISBN Agency. The registration with the US Copyright office is optional.

The Copyright Law of the US states:

Copyright in a work created on or after January 1, 1978, subsists from its creation and, except as provided by the following subsections, endures for a term consisting of the life of the author and 70 years after the author’s death. I am alive.

Contractors and grantees are not considered Government employees; generally they hold copyright to works they produce for the Government.Other non-Government organizations and authorsincluding foreign governments and international organizations, also hold copyright in their works. I am not (was not) officer or employee of the US Government and my work must not be copied and distributed in its entirety without permission. According to the Bulgarian Copyrights and Neighbouring Rights Act (Art. 41(1)) the copyright on a work created within the framework of an employment or official legal relationship belongs to the author. Mr Miles disagreed: ”A soldier that digs a hole or builds a hut does not get to keep it when they quit the army.” My book is not a construction or regular work.

Public domain (definition of Wikipedia) ”consists of all the creative work to which no exclusive intellectual property rights apply. Those rights may have expired, been forfeited, expressly waived, or may be inapplicable”. None of the later is true. So, my work is not in the US, France or EU public domains to be copied and distributed in its entirety without my permission. As a third-party (EU citizen) you make me feel like a street dog, not a slave (slaves get water and bread).

Since 2003 (17 years) Amazon and its business partners used to sell my book freely without my permission: Stormingmedia, Smiley Books, Mr Miles, etc. at prices 27, 10, 870, 1012 USD and 150 EUR (Amazon.fr).

Amazon instructed me to provide them with notice that a lawsuit before the Federal District Court of Mr Miles, CA, US, has been filed by me within 10 business days, i.e., court expenses, lawyer's fee, travel expenses, and they know that will not happen. So, Amazon will allow this material to be accessible again. What is the court for? To prove I am alive? Why does Mr Miles have no obligation to prove his statement of public domain? He can go to any US library, borrow a book, copy and sell it because it is in the public domain.

Finally, probably thousands of books are sold without authors'/their agents' consent and royalties. In other words, the EU is likely in a lose-lose situation with Amazon, the EU economy lost millions USD and EUR (authors' copyrights, companies' trade marks, their incomes and state income taxes).

Best regards,

Georgi Politov

July 6, 2020, Sofia, Bulgaria"